PET-CT underestimates the true pathological extent of disease at lymphadenectomy for melanoma patients after systemic therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Modern systemic therapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma. Currently, patients with clinically involved lymph nodes require lymphadenectomy with associated morbidities. Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) has demonstrated accuracy in melanoma detection and response to therapy. We aimed to identify whether a PET-CT directed lymphatic resection after systemic therapy is oncologically sound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy after systemic therapy for melanoma with a preoperative PET-CT. Examined demographic, clinical, and perioperative parameters including extent of disease, systemic therapy and response, and PET-CT findings compared to pathological outcomes. We compared patients with "as or less than expected" outcomes on pathology against those with "more than expected" pathological outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. In 28 (71.8%), pathological outcomes were "as or less than expected" by PET-CT, and in 11 (28.2%) pathological outcome were "more than expected". "More than expected" occurred more frequently with advanced disease at presentation with 75% presenting with regional/metastatic disease versus only 42.9% in the "as or less than expected" group (p = 0.015). Poor response to therapy also trended towards the "more than expected" group with only 27.3% favorable response versus 53.6% favorable response in the "as or less than expected" group, not statistically significant. Extent of disease on imaging failed to predict pathological concordance. CONCLUSION: PET-CT underestimates pathological extent of disease in the lymphatic basin in 30% of patients after systemic therapy. We failed to identify predictors of more extensive disease and warn against limited PET-CT directed lymphatic resections.

Case-control study of complications associated with bipolar and monopolar hysteroscopic operations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether all hysteroscopic operations can be performed using bipolar technology and to compare the complication rates of hysteroscopic surgery performed using monopolar and bipolar technology. DESIGN: Case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Endoscopic gynecology unit at a tertiary-care university hospital. PATIENTS: Women aged 17 to 88 years (median, 43.9 years) who underwent operative hysteroscopy to treat uterine disease. INTERVENTIONS: Operative hysteroscopy using bipolar technology and normal saline solution as irrigation medium. The control group was composed of women who underwent the procedure using monopolar technology, with glycine as irrigation medium, before adoption of bipolar technology. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data regarding short-term complications were prospectively obtained during surgery and at 2-week follow-up. More than 1800 procedures were investigated (1318 in the study group and 524 in the control group). The complication rate was 4.1% in the study group and 2.8% in the control group (p = .08). CONCLUSION: Both monopolar and bipolar hysteroscopic techniques are safe and feasible. The bipolar hysteroscopic system has eliminated the need to use hypotonic solutions as irrigation medium, with its life-threatening complications. When limiting normal saline solution to 2 L, no serious complications associated with irrigation medium are expected. Therefore, we believe that when available, the bipolar system should be preferred.